Arc Teryx Bora 80 Internal Frame Backpacks
Arc Teryx Bora 80 Internal Frame Backpacks
USER REVIEWS
[May 06, 2011]
ufotds
Mountaineer
I just purchased this pack and haven't used it yet. So this review is about the design choices and makes no claim on comfort under load bearing.
Customer Service The website of Arc'teryx has an excellent illustrated guide of how to fit their packs. Other than that, not needed yet. Similar Products Used: Crap Aldi backpack that hurt my shoulders for years... |
[Sep 28, 2005]
wildernessness
Mountaineer
A bit of a heavy pack but should never die on you - that's the trade off. Got poured on one day with hail - the whole bit - and the watertight zippers held. Nothing got wet. Super comfy. Never anything more so. Quiet. My previous pack squeeked my crazy. Good pockets. The kangaroo pocket is really useful. The pocket inside the kangaroo is much less so. If the kangaroo is full you can't access anything iside that other one. There is no pocket in the lid - that is unfortunate but bearable. The side pockets are cavernous so you can put small items there when using a water bladder. Customer Service Haven't used yet. Similar Products Used: North Face Fusion Kelty Zuni Mountainsmith Wizard |
[Aug 29, 2004]
mlevison
Backpacker
This is the third backpack I've ever owned and it will the last. Even with a load over 60 lbs (on my 160 lb frame), the pack feels comfortable. I've done trails over a week in length and unlike many of my fellow hikers I've never had a problem. Its seems I carry a spare buckles and sewing kit to repair other peoples packs. Price was in Canadian $$ In addition to backpacking, I also lived out this pack for a year while I travelled around Australia and New Zealand. Aside from comments about the side pockets, I couldn't have asked for a better pack. Similar Products Used: External frame from ???; Basic MEC internal frame. |
[Apr 28, 2004]
lotusglass.com
Backpacker
This pack is a well made piece of equipment. By far the best I have tried. It carries heavy loads (45 lbs) very well. The waterproof zippers are nice. They keep weight down and are pretty effective at keeping water out. The side pockets are still a little small, even after they were redesigned (however, you can cram a nalgene in them if you try). The sleeping bag compartment is large enough for my winter bag, which is a plus. One problem I had with this pack was the hip belt to torso ratio. I needed a medium torso length, but the medium hip belt was way too big. I have relativly broad shoulders and a slim waist, so the medium belt would not hold the load on my hips properly. I had to buy a small hipbelt to replace the medium to accomadate my build. I imagine this would be the same for tall slender people as well, as the medium hipbelt's smallest setting is 32 inches. The shoulder straps, hipbelt and back panel are made from a thermo moulded foam material that is top of the line. It gives just the right amount of cushioning while still providing awesome support. This pack may be pricey, but trust me, when you are lugging heavy loads over uneven terrain, you will appreciate the load carring capacity of this pack. Comfort is key. There is no point in being miserable while you are on the move. Customer Service I haven't needed it yet, however REI's customer service is THE BEST, PERIOD. Similar Products Used: rei crappy pack, kelty external frame, lowe alpine contour, |
[Dec 10, 2003]
divinity09
Backpacker
Just a really wonderful pack. For awhile I was trying to figure out what pack to get, even though I had tried this one on in the shops and new I liked it better than any of the others. I almost settled. Then I found it at a good price (the college gods smile down upon us sometimes). So, the pack works great, has everything I could need (straps pockets space), and is extremely adaptable (comfort and capacity). It works. Customer Service I contacted them with some questions before I bought the pack and they were just amazing. Similar Products Used: Gregory packs, Dana Designs (good value!) |
[Aug 22, 2003]
Jmaan
Backpacker
Being out of the "overnight backpacking loop" for about 15 years and (putting on the lb's in that timespan), I researched, heavily, backpacks in an effort to make sure that I was buying as comfortable a backpack as possible. I couldn't have been happier. No backpack related aches and pains to report here as the Bora 80 came through in flying colors over a 3 day timespan in Desolation Wilderness. The weight distribution of the pack really made it easy for me to take the climbs with little or no worry at all. I did pack heavy because I wanted to be able to carry enough to go solo (although I did go with a group of 7). The additional kangaroo pouch came in handy as I needed a place to store my swimming trunks. I used a Camelbak Unbottle 100oz but was not able to slip it into the hydration-ready sleeve inside the pack but that was ok. I just slipped it into the pack and away I want, water at my ready. The daisy chains were very usefull as I placed my camera bag on one of them along with my map holder. I didn't find the need to utilize the side-zipper access capabilities. My first overnighter in 15 years, and thanks to the Bora 80, I'm planning on doing several trips each and every year until I'm 6 feet under. Oh, by the way, I feel pretty confident that this will be the last backpack I ever buy. And the price at Mickies Place was just what the doctor ordered. I got lucky. Thanks Arc'Teryx! Customer Service No reason to contact Arc'Teryx 'cept to thank them. |
[Jul 10, 2003]
stuenp
Backpacker
I have had many, many different backpacks from many different companies. Never, has any suited my needs better than the design and versitlity of this pack. Three thumbs up!? Similar Products Used: I don't like to talk poorly about other's, but ahhhggg.northface.ggghhhh. Sorry, couldn't resist |
[Jul 08, 2003]
markj1
Backpacker
This was one of the last packs to be cut before I made my final choice on an internal frame pack. The organization of storage compartments on the pack is typical for well designed internal frame bacpacks: 1)in addition to a large main compartment, there is a single, spacious "kangaroo" pocket running vertically along the front of the pack; this pocket features a small drain hole and full length zipper access. 2) The sleeping bag comparment is separated from the main compartment by a cloth panel, and is separately accessible via a zipper that runs horizontally 3/4 of the way around the pack. I have a more difficult time packing and closing this compartment than I do with sleeping bag compartments that feature a zippered semicircular access panel. 3)The only side pockets are small and low. A 1 liter Nalgene bottle will fit in these, but they are prone to accidental ejection--e.g. I found a loose bottle in my pack cover after one hike. 4)A hydration bladder sleeve pocket is sewn into the main compartment, and a hose exit hole is provided on one side of the pack. The provided "pocket" is large enough to hold a 3 liter Platypus bladder VERY snugly. Unfortunately, the pocket appears to be an afterthought, as it is only sewn on one edge, and thus allows the bladder to be pushed around when the main compartment is stuffed. This can lead to the bladder being off center or pushed away from the back panel which leads to dimished load balance. The hydration bladder will also occupy part of the prime loading space in the main compartment. I wish the hose opening was larger (it's difficult to feed a bite valve through) and that one was provided on both sides of the pack. 5)The lid has a pocket and is removeable for day hikes, etc. 6)Extras: good compression straps on sides and bottom provide load control and gear attachment points; 2 ice axe loops are provided with velcro loops higher on the pack to secure the shaft (not all packs that have axe loops include this). My take: everything about this pack screams quality--good fabric, good balance, well padded straps, and a smart overall layout. The pack even looks nice. When I loaded the pack to 40 lbs (including the bag itself), the balance was still very nice, but the pack sagged and began to slide down my back. This took only a few miles of hiking on moderate terrain to be painfully obvious. I would hate to know how more weight on rougher terrain would be handled. The pack fit beautifully and was initially comfortable, but I could not make any adjustments that prevented the load from sagging. By contrast, the Gregory Lassen I tried later did not sag like this with the same weight. Based on my experience, I would not recommend this pack for anyone who plans to even come close to filling this pack. Customer Service Arc'Teryx: N/A; REI: Excellent--they accepted the return without any trouble. Similar Products Used: Gregory Lassen Kelty Pacific Crest (external) |
[Jul 08, 2003]
galileo
Mountaineer
I have had this pack for three years now and my outdoors experience has greatly improved because of it. I've taken this pack on Rainier, Shasta, and extended trips in the West carrying loads up to 45 lbs with no issues. The hip belt and back cushioning is very comfortable and I appreciate the simple functionality of the side compression straps. Being relatively petite, I don't enjoy wrestling with sleeping bags, therefore, I appreciate the Bora 80's relatively roomy base compartment for securing my lofty winter bag. Unlike some other reviewers, I have not had an issue with material durability or nalgene compatability. Similar Products Used: Lowe Alpine Gregory |
[Jul 05, 2003]
novus777
Mountaineer
As previous reviews state, this pack is very comfortable with loads under 50lbs, however I've found that this pack cannot handle anything higher as it loses stability. I love the aesthetics, and the thermofoam backpad, and the top pouch converts to a very comfortable fanny pack. Arcteryx redesigned the side pockets to accept bottles and larger items much more easily than previous models. The faults: I've used an older Bora 90 and in comparison the material used in the newer Bora 80 is not as durable--the material in several places had ruffled up after only 3 days of use, the plastic strap retainers on the bottom have broken off after 12 days of use. I don't care much for the weight of the pack considering the pack volume in comparison to the newer model packs out there. Conclusion: This pack is an extremely comfortable backpack when hefting loads under 50 lbs. It allows a great variety in adjusments to handle downhill descents or uphill treading. I love the aesthetics (consistent with all Arcteryx products), but I do worry about the durability. My next pack will probably be an Osprey--unless Arcteryx redesigns this pack with stronger and lighter material. Customer Service Never used. Similar Products Used: ALICE pack Load Bearing Vest (military version- makes carrying loads extremely comfortable) Eureka Lowe Alpine Arcteryx Bora 90 |