Salomon North America Super Mountain 9 Snow & Ice Mountaineering Boots
Salomon North America Super Mountain 9 Snow & Ice Mountaineering Boots
USER REVIEWS
[Mar 16, 2004]
Ev_Cushing
Mountaineer
Ouch! The break-in is horrible. If you buy these boots allow at least a month or two of REAL use before they stop breaking YOU in. I got them really cheap and they're excellent technical climbers, but I still have a really hard time wearing them for more than one day in a row and it's been a few months. Maybe I'm just a wuss but I keep having to retreat to the comfort of plastics. Similar Products Used: Koflach Degrees and La Sportiva Lady Makalu's |
[Nov 06, 2001]
Robert Colville
Mountaineer
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None I have had these boots now for a couple of months and I must say that I''m impressed with the results. They are very warm and supportive, but I''m not entirely convinced that they''re rigid. I find that the plastic rand is a little prone to being scratched off on rough rock, but otherwise fine. I love the leather - 3.4mm is the thickest I''ve ever heard of, it certainly is protective. However, I do find the tounge a little tight, but it may just be my feet. Overall great deal (especially as I got them at less than half priceas new!!!) Customer Service Havn''t had any problems so far. Similar Products Used: None! First time ''rigid'' leather boot. |
[Jul 22, 2001]
Matt
Climber
I bought these boots about 3.5 years ago. the Fit was good and the feel is very stiff, these were great for Ice climbing, However they do suffer from a couple of draw backs (at least for me) Customer Service I am talking to them know about fixing them.....So far it has not been the best I have encoutered Similar Products Used: La Sportivia (my new ones the best) Lhotse and Lowa Civetta (plastic yuk) |
[Dec 28, 2000]
STW
Mountaineer
Very stiff! seamingly stiffer than other leather ice climbing boots. Therefore, they front-point exceedingly well! Also therefore, they are less comfortable for hiking and lower angle ice. However, they are still more comfortable than any plastic boots I've ever owned. Lots of people have had problems with the internal pull-tab lacing system. So far, I have been lucky. My one nit: the boots have a sticky rubber rand around most of the boot, but a hard plastic section near the front that protects the boot from the crampon bail. This overhangs the sole just a tiny bit and hinders rock climbing/edging performance a bit. It's a minor flaw in an otherwise great technical climbing boot. On top of everything else, they're quite warm (even though my model doesn't have any extra insulation - like the 'thermic' model) as long as I wear a decent gaiter. Similar Products Used: Garmont Fusion, Now trying the scarpa freney - looks awesome so far |
[Sep 20, 2000]
joan collins
Mountaineer
This is a stiff, heavy, well-constructed boot, ideal for lower-temperature use. The lacing system allows great adjustability, but I had to replace the insoles with Superfeet to get a good fit. The rocker sole makes it comfortable for long walk-ins. On the downside, the bulging, smooth plastic rand holds the sole away from the rock, so doesn't help at all with grip. This is most apparent when edging, or without crampons. This lack of sensitivity, combined with the stiffness, makes it less than ideal for high-grade ice. But for heavy duty winter use on easy to moderate snow/ice routes, it's a winner. Similar Products Used: Scarpa Vega, Scarpa Freney, Koflach Viva Soft |
[Sep 13, 2000]
Roy Grossinger
Climber
Bought several years ago. Used on Rainier 10X, Ecuador, Peru and for ice climbing. The best all-round boot available. I’m actually warmer in these boots then in plastic. Buying my second pair now, after the last trip to Peru the back seams gave out, but still performed as always. Never, ever got wet feet. If you're in really cold temps, placing a handwarmer in the toe box prior to going to bed helps a lot with donning the boots in the morning. |
[Dec 29, 1999]
Neal Douglass
Climber
I first purchased a pair of the boots last November. Break in was pretty short, 5 or 6 climbs. Unfortunately the boots began to have problems. The tongue detached from the boot leaving a very tight toe box. I returned them for a replacement (slow) but the new boots are a slightly different fit. More room in the toe box as well as an extra insole. The new boots are great performers as well as a comfy fit. Customer Service When I returned the boots, the repair department lost the records. I had to track the package to verify receipt at the facility. The repair took nearly two months, a little slow for a replacement. |
[Dec 21, 1999]
Dr. Daniel Torres
Mountaineer
I purchase this pair barely when they came out. I have used mostly to climb in the Mexican volcanos. |
[Dec 19, 1999]
Richard
Mountaineer
I love these boots. They are very stiff for ice climbing but are also great mountaineering boots. They fit like a light weight boot but have very good support. The only drawback I would see to purchacing these boots is the price. These boots are a bit pricy, but they are worth it. I was lucky to find a guy on the internet that sold me them for $180. Look for the good deals- they are out there. Similar Products Used: Scarpa Invernos, Koflach Arctic Expos. |
[Jan 06, 2000]
William Settina
Mountaineer
From scree/talus fields, to mud, snow, and ice, this boot has been bombproof, comfortable, dry. When you want the best- this is what you get. |