Tubbs Adventure 21, 25, 30 Snow Shoes
Tubbs Adventure 21, 25, 30 Snow Shoes
USER REVIEWS
[Aug 25, 2021]
shemikasoraya
Strength:
Recommended for slightly packed trails or for snowshoe running. Came undone once but usually has secure mount to the boot. Kind of expensive but if these fit your needs, go for it. Countertop Installation Weakness:
none so far Purchased: New
|
[May 03, 2003]
Christopher
Climber
I used these shoes for the rather long approaches ice climbing in northern Canada. I had serious issues pertaining to the bindings with these snowshoes: 1. The tightening straps are damn near impossible to use with cold fingers. 2. The heel strap kept slipping off of my mountaineering boots, even though the heel of my boot had a crampon welt for the heel strap to fit in. 3. In Canada where we were climbing, the average temperature during the day never got above 0 F and the straps iced over making it impossible no matter how hard you tried to dial in your bindings. So my overall consensus of the binding is that they suck. I diffidently like the Atlas ratchet binding system much better. |
[Jan 29, 2001]
Neal Boutin
Backpacker
An avid warm weather hiker, I haven't had a good winter activity for years (no more skiing for me). My (soon to be) wife suggested snowshoeing so I started looking into it. I decided on Tubbs shoes as they seemed more rugged than the Atlas shoes of equal price ($165 range). My wife liked that there was a women's specific model. Similar Products Used: None |
[Sep 01, 2000]
Glenn
Day Hiker
These shoes have a very good binding system. At 185lbs the 30's work great. Climbing and decending was very good, off canber was alittle tricky but nothing you can't get use to. Overall a great shoe at a great price. Similar Products Used: I've looked at others but for the price the Tubbs were the best built and had the best binding system without having to spend the money on a specialized binding. |
[May 13, 2000]
Heather A. Bee
Day Hiker
I have the Adventure 25 series. I believe them to be a good value. My partner has the Atlas 1033s and I think that the Tubbs are as good as far as "floating" on the snow and the Atlas 1033s are significantly more expensive. The only drawback to the Tubbs are the bindings--these are not easy to do with cold fingers and I usually have to have my partner to the final cinching. With any snowshoes I would remind the beginner that they are not meant to completely float on the snow and that it can be a strenuous, but wonderful sport! Similar Products Used: Low-end Atlas snowshoes--hated them. Tubbs has some kind of feature that makes the back end "spring up" as you are hiking. |
[Mar 21, 2000]
Kathleen Helmer
Backpacker
Okay here's the scoop! If you're wanting to try snowshoeing out and you've never been. These are a good priced shoe for the first few times. I think that if you become more involved with snowshoeing you'll want the type that has the clasps that buckle and cinch down. They provide a better fit. |
[Sep 22, 1999]
Tyler McConnell
Day Hiker
I got these as a gift also, for a 125 pounder, these hold up pretty good. Similar Products Used: None |
[Mar 18, 1999]
John
Day Hiker
Have the LL Bean version. Good quality but a larger shoe is definately more suitable for deep powder. Recommended for slightly packed trails or for snowshoe running. Came undone once but usually has secure mount to the boot. Kind of expensive but if these fit your needs, go for it. Similar Products Used: None |
[Apr 14, 1999]
adam
Day Hiker
Are great for hiking on flat trails. also work well for ging up hills. Have had a problem with offcamber trails because the binding system is not rigid enough. Other than that I really like them. Customer Service Customer service was good. One of the rivets broke on the bindings and they promptly repared it for me. Similar Products Used: None |
[Jul 28, 1999]
mike pisano
Day Hiker
Good Value, light weight, easy entry Similar Products Used: None |