Atomic M:11 Puls Ti All Mountain

Atomic M:11 Puls Ti All Mountain 

DESCRIPTION

The Atomic M:11 Puls Ti Alpine Ski’s groundbreaking Metron geometry seldom fails to illicit a strong response. People who see it will do a double take on the massive sidecut. The M:11’s radical design and measurements mesh with Atomic’s Beta 4 profile and Titanium Pulser system to create the improbable combination of huge float and lightning fast carving.

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-2 of 2  
[Jan 22, 2010]
curtc73
Skier

I purchased my 2005 Metron M:11 Puls Ti skis in 2007 and as a ski patroller, I have put a lot of hours on them in the past two years. Simply put, they LOVE to turn. These are NOT made for long, flowing high-speed turns, and in fact they get rather twitchy when they are not up on edge. The large shovel helps them float in the soft stuff, and the extra weight gives them great kinetic energy when plowing through crud, but they have to be skied on-edge all of the time.

Customer Service

Atomic issued a binding recall, and when I brought them into my local shop it was handled on the spot. Great Service at Viking !

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[May 17, 2006]
STW
Skier

Extremely turny. That's the overwhelming impression from these skis. They want to turn! Short and medium turns especially. These things just rip off short turn after short turn with incredible confidence in any conditions. Turn them over just the slightest bit and they hook up and go.

These are slalom skis. They are not that great for lazy, long GS turns. They hold a great edge on hardpack and ice. Yet, I could also keep up with my buddies in knee-deep powder.

Like all of the Atomic Metron skis, these pups are heavy. My skis are the 2005 model year. I bought the newer 2006 model year NEOX 412 binding to mount on these because the 2006 bindings are reportedly 1 pound lighter than the 2005 models (they require Atomic NEOX bindings - no other options). Even with that weight savings, these skis are wicked heavy. You notice it most when you are carrying them from the car. Once you're skiing, you don't notice it so much. The swing weight is actually quite low. Most of the weight is in the middle of the ski. The extra weight actually helps these bad boys blast through slop, crud and cement.

They are designed to be skied short. They have a lot of sidecut. The tips are super wide and that helps them float a bit in deep snow, but they're pretty narrow under foot. Apparently the Metron 11's are similar in sidecut to the Metron B5's, but are a little bit softer. They're still a pretty stiff ski though. The fact that ther're a little less stiff than the B5's made them more fun to ski in moguls, trees and steeps; although perhaps they did slip a tiny bit more on ice.

Overall, I loved these skis for skiing all over the mountain except deeper powder and GS runs.

Customer Service

no experiences

Similar Products Used:

Older Atomics, K2's, Rossi's, Volkls, ...

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
Showing 1-2 of 2  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

outdoorreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com